GS Paper 4 (Ethics)Ethics in public administrationUPSC CSE Mains 2023
Vinod is an honest and sincere IAS officer. Recently, he has taken over as Managing Director of the State Road Transport Corporation, his sixth transfer in the past three years. His peers acknowledge his vast knowledge, affability and uprightness. The Chairman of the State Road Transport Corporation is a powerful politician and is very close to the Chief Minister. Vinod comes to know about many alleged irregularities of the Corporation and the high-handedness of the Chairman in financial matters. A Board Member of the Corporation belonging to the Opposition Party meets Vinod and hands over a few documents along with a video recording in which the Chairman appears to be demanding bribe for placing a huge order for the supply of QMR tyres. Vinod recollects the Chairman expediting clearing of pending bills of QMR tyres. Vinod confronts the Board Member as to why he is shying away from exposing the Chairman with the so-called solid proof he has with him. The member informs him that the Chairman refuses to yield to his threats. He adds that Vinod may earn recognition and public support if he himself exposes the Chairman. Further, he tells Vinod that once his party comes to power, Vinod's professional growth would be assured. Vinod is aware that he may be penalized if he exposes the Chairman and may further be transferred to a distant place. He knows that the Opposition Party stands a better chance of coming to power in the forthcoming elections. However, he also realizes that the Board Member is trying to use him for his own political gains. (a) As a conscientious civil servant, evaluate the options available to Vinod. (b) In the light of the above case, comment upon the ethical issues that may arise due to the politicization of bureaucracy.
Based on 19 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- Verify authenticity of the video and documents before acting, since they come from a politically motivated source and may be planted.
- Name the institutional channel: CVC, Lokayukta or the state Anti-Corruption Bureau, with a written complaint and evidence record.
- Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014 as a legal safeguard for identity and complaint process.
- Transfers as a political tool to punish honest officers, linked to Vinod's sixth transfer in three years.
- Conflict of interest arising from the Chairman's proximity to the Chief Minister and the Board Member's quid pro quo offer.
- Fixed tenure and insulation mechanisms recommended by the Second ARC as a solution to politicisation.
Common mistakes
- Listing options without clearly stating which one Vinod should choose and why.
- Treating the Opposition member's offer as a generic label without linking it to the QMR tyre case facts.
- Ignoring the verification of evidence and the risk of acting on partisan material.
- Using a concluding paragraph that repeats the options instead of giving a decisive course of action.
What the better answers did
- Clear split of part (a) into options with merits and demerits, followed by a single recommended course.
- Linking each ethical issue in part (b) to a specific fact of the case, such as the transfers or the bribe demand.
- Citing the Prevention of Corruption Act, Whistle Blowers Protection Act and AIS Conduct Rules with precise relevance.
- Concise answers that avoid stock quotes and general commentary on politics.
Introduction
Open by framing Vinod's dilemma as a choice between institutional integrity and political expediency, not as a choice about whether to be brave.
Conclusion
End by stating that Vinod should verify the evidence and report to CVC or the Lokayukta, and that fixed tenure would reduce such pressure in future.
Model answer
Vinod faces a conflict between his duty to uphold public integrity and the risk of political retaliation. His response must be lawful, evidence-based and insulated from the Opposition's agenda.
(a) Options available to Vinod
- Stay silent: Avoids transfer but makes him complicit in bribery and erodes public trust. Violates the integrity and devotion to duty expected under the AIS (Conduct) Rules, 1968.
- Public exposure through the Board Member or media: Gains public attention but is risky. Using a partisan source hands the Chairman a defence that the case is political, and it may expose Vinod to defamation and service action.
- Verify and report to CVC or the Anti-Corruption Bureau/Lokayukta: Institutional route under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Section 7 covers demand of illegal gratification). The Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2014 provides a complaint mechanism and identity protection. Vinod should first authenticate the video and documents and record the chain of custody.
- Escalate to Chief Secretary and document everything: Creates an official record and checks political pressure, though it may not be enough alone against a powerful Chairman.
Best course: Verify the evidence, report to CVC or the Lokayukta in writing, and inform the Chief Secretary. Do not accept any political promise and do not act on the Board Member's agenda.
(b) Ethical issues from politicisation
- Frequent transfers as punishment: Vinod's sixth transfer in three years shows how transfers silence honest officers. Fixed tenure and a Civil Services Board, recommended by the Second ARC in its ethics and governance reports, can reduce this.
- Conflict of interest: The Chairman's proximity to the Chief Minister and the Opposition member's quid pro quo offer both compromise impartial decision-making over the QMR tyre contract.
- Erosion of neutrality: Vinod is pulled between the political executive and his duty to the rule of law. Accepting the Opposition's patronage would convert him into a partisan actor.
- Public trust: Whether the Chairman or the Opposition wins, citizens lose faith in the administration when exposés become political weapons.
Politicisation thus harms the rule of law and public trust. Strengthening institutional safeguards such as fixed tenure, independent complaint channels and an insulated civil service is the durable answer.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start UPSC Mains answer evaluation with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerAsked in UPSC Mains 2023 GS Paper 4 (Ethics). See all 2023 GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
More GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
- What is meant by environmental ethics? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics.
- The principle of impartiality may conflict with the need for compassion towards marginalized communities. Discuss in the context of civil services in India.
- "Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment but a product of civil education and adherence of the rule of law." Examine the significance of constitutional morality for public servant highlighting the role in promoting good governance and ensuring accountability in public administration.
- "We can never obtain peace in the outer world until and unless we obtain peace within ourselves." – Dalai Lama
- Wisdom lies in knowing what to reckon with and what to overlook. An officer being engrossed with the periphery, ignoring the core issues before him, is not rare in the bureaucracy. Do you agree that such preoccupation of an administrator leads to travesty of justice to the cause of effective service delivery and good governance? Critically evaluate.
- "Emotional Intelligence is the ability to make your emotions work for you instead of against you." Do you agree with this view? Discuss.