GS Paper 4 (Ethics)Emotional intelligence in governanceUPSC CSE Mains 2019
"Emotional Intelligence is the ability to make your emotions work for you instead of against you." Do you agree with this view? Discuss.
Based on 20 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- Goleman's five components (self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, social skills) should be named and applied in the body, not only in the conclusion.
- The 'against you' half of the quote: unmanaged anger, fear or stress distorting decisions, with a concrete example.
- A civil services or governance example, such as a District Collector defusing communal tension or handling public grievances.
- A clear stance on 'Do you agree?' stated in the introduction, for example 'largely agree, with limits'.
- The counter-view that EI can be misused for manipulation, and that it needs ethical values to stay constructive.
Common mistakes
- Treating the question as a general essay on the benefits of EI, with no link to how emotions specifically 'work for' or 'against' a person.
- Giving no stand on 'Do you agree?', or ending with a neutral summary instead of a position.
- Using factually wrong or irrelevant examples, such as a leader with poor emotional regulation cited as an EI success, or a religious episode that is about faith rather than emotion.
- Confusing overthinking or poor communication with EI, or treating the absence of EI as EI working against you.
- Repetitive bullet points with one-word labels and no examples for empathy or social skills.
What the better answers did
- A crisp opening definition followed by a direct stance on the quote.
- Naming Goleman's components and attaching a short, specific example to each, such as Mandela for self-regulation.
- Separate sections for how emotions work for us, when they work against us, and the limits of the view, which directly addresses 'Discuss'.
- Grounding the answer in governance, such as a District Collector's public hearing or a mediator in communal disputes, to show UPSC relevance.
Introduction
State your position in the first two lines, for example 'I largely agree, with limits', and name Goleman's five components so the answer is anchored from the start.
Conclusion
Close by restating that EI works only when combined with ethics and reason, and tie this back to the civil servant's decisions rather than repeating the definition.
Model answer
I largely agree. Emotional intelligence (EI), as framed by Daniel Goleman, rests on five components: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills. Its value lies not in suppressing feelings but in channelling them. The view needs two qualifications: emotions cannot always be controlled, and EI can be misused.
How emotions work for us
- Self-awareness: recognising fear or anger early lets a person question a hasty judgement before acting on it.
- Self-regulation: the pause between stimulus and response. Nelson Mandela's years in prison, where he chose reconciliation over vengeance, show anger turned into statesmanship.
- Motivation: indignation at injustice has driven reform, as in Dr B R Ambedkar's campaigns against untouchability.
- Empathy and social skills: a District Collector who hears grievances at an open public hearing defuses tension that a rigid official would escalate.
When emotions work against us
- Unmanaged anger or fear produces impulsive orders, such as using force on a rumour before verifying facts.
- Chronic stress leads to burnout, common among social workers and doctors facing heavy emotional labour.
- Panic-driven decisions during a crisis can ignore data and distort policy.
Limits of the view
- Low EI is the absence of the ability the quote describes, not EI working against us.
- Using emotional awareness to manipulate others is misuse, and needs ethical values as an anchor.
- Over-reliance on emotional judgement may delay decisions or bend rules, so reason must test feeling.
EI makes emotions an asset when combined with ethics and reasoning. It turns anger into reform and stress into resilience, but it is no substitute for integrity. For civil servants, the test is whether feeling informs a decision without deciding it.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start UPSC Mains answer evaluation with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerAsked in UPSC Mains 2019 GS Paper 4 (Ethics). See all 2019 GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
More GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
- What is meant by environmental ethics? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics.
- Vinod is an honest and sincere IAS officer. Recently, he has taken over as Managing Director of the State Road Transport Corporation, his sixth transfer in the past three years. His peers acknowledge his vast knowledge, affability and uprightness. The Chairman of the State Road Transport Corporation is a powerful politician and is very close to the Chief Minister. Vinod comes to know about many alleged irregularities of the Corporation and the high-handedness of the Chairman in financial matters. A Board Member of the Corporation belonging to the Opposition Party meets Vinod and hands over a few documents along with a video recording in which the Chairman appears to be demanding bribe for placing a huge order for the supply of QMR tyres. Vinod recollects the Chairman expediting clearing of pending bills of QMR tyres. Vinod confronts the Board Member as to why he is shying away from exposing the Chairman with the so-called solid proof he has with him. The member informs him that the Chairman refuses to yield to his threats. He adds that Vinod may earn recognition and public support if he himself exposes the Chairman. Further, he tells Vinod that once his party comes to power, Vinod's professional growth would be assured. Vinod is aware that he may be penalized if he exposes the Chairman and may further be transferred to a distant place. He knows that the Opposition Party stands a better chance of coming to power in the forthcoming elections. However, he also realizes that the Board Member is trying to use him for his own political gains. (a) As a conscientious civil servant, evaluate the options available to Vinod. (b) In the light of the above case, comment upon the ethical issues that may arise due to the politicization of bureaucracy.
- The principle of impartiality may conflict with the need for compassion towards marginalized communities. Discuss in the context of civil services in India.
- "Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment but a product of civil education and adherence of the rule of law." Examine the significance of constitutional morality for public servant highlighting the role in promoting good governance and ensuring accountability in public administration.
- "We can never obtain peace in the outer world until and unless we obtain peace within ourselves." – Dalai Lama
- Wisdom lies in knowing what to reckon with and what to overlook. An officer being engrossed with the periphery, ignoring the core issues before him, is not rare in the bureaucracy. Do you agree that such preoccupation of an administrator leads to travesty of justice to the cause of effective service delivery and good governance? Critically evaluate.