GS Paper 4 (Ethics)Probity in governance
Probity is essential for an effective system of governance and socio-economic development. Discuss.
Based on 31 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- Probity's social dimension: DBT in welfare schemes reduces leakages and ensures equitable delivery to intended beneficiaries, with a concrete example
- Institutional mechanisms such as the Lokpal, CVC, CAG and RTI Act, not just a general call for integrity
- The Second ARC's 4th report on Ethics in Governance (codes of ethics, asset disclosure) as a direct answer to effective governance
- Economic link: probity attracts investment, improves ease of doing business rankings and reduces the cost of corruption
- The 2G scam as an example of probity failure and its effect on trust and investment, contrasted with transparent auctions
- Probity's components (integrity, transparency, accountability, impartiality) defined before linking them to outcomes
Common mistakes
- Defining probity loosely as doing good or being moral, rather than honesty and uprightness in public dealings
- Giving generic examples without figures, dates or named institutions, or using unverifiable or irrelevant cases
- Describing mechanisms without explaining how they produce better governance or development outcomes
- Spending more space on challenges or remedies than on the essentiality argument the question asks for
What the better answers did
- Opening with a precise definition of probity and linking it to the question's two outcomes, governance and socio-economic development
- Separating governance effectiveness and socio-economic development under clear subheadings
- Using verifiable examples such as the 2G case, DBT and e-procurement, each tied explicitly to probity
- Ending with a specific, forward-looking conclusion rather than a generic call for ethics
Introduction
Define probity as honesty and uprightness in public dealings in one line, then state that it drives both effective governance and development.
Conclusion
End by linking probity to institutional strengthening, whistleblower protection and digital transparency, which show how governance and development reinforce each other.
Model answer
Probity, meaning uprightness and honesty in public dealings, is the foundation of effective governance. Where public office is used for private gain, resources are wasted and the state's capacity to deliver development is weakened.
Probity and effective governance
- Transparency and accountability: Probity operationalises the Nolan Committee's seven principles of public life, including selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness and honesty.
- Impartial, merit-based decisions: Honest allocation of resources reduces delays and improves service delivery.
- Institutional safeguards: The Lokpal (functional since 2019), CVC, CAG and the RTI Act 2005 enforce standards and expose lapses. The Second ARC's 4th report on Ethics in Governance recommended codes of ethics, asset disclosure and whistleblower protection.
Probity and socio-economic development
- Welfare delivery: Direct Benefit Transfer and Aadhaar-linked payments cut intermediary leakages, so subsidies reach intended beneficiaries.
- Investor confidence: Clean governance lowers transaction costs and risk, supporting FDI and better ease of doing business rankings.
- Value for money: Transparent tenders and e-procurement secure competitive prices and more infrastructure per rupee.
- Lesson from failure: The 2G spectrum allocation, which the CAG estimated at a notional loss of Rs 1.76 lakh crore, eroded public trust. Subsequent transparent auctions showed that open processes restore credibility.
Challenges
- Weak whistleblower protection, limited independence of oversight bodies and political pressure dilute probity in practice.
Probity is therefore both a governance principle and a development strategy. Strengthening independent institutions, protecting whistleblowers and using digital systems for transparency can make efficient governance and inclusive growth mutually reinforcing.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerMore GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
- 'Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it.' - Dalai Lama
- Is conscience a more reliable guide when compared to laws, rules and regulations in the context of ethical decision-making? Discuss.
- The application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view.
- What really matters for success, character, happiness, and lifelong achievements is a definite set of emotional skills—your EQ—not just purely cognitive abilities that are measured by conventional IQ tests. Do you agree with this view? Give reasons in support of your answer.
- In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so. — Immanuel Kant
- Subash is Secretary, PWD in the State Government. He is a senior officer, known for his competence, integrity and dedication to work. He enjoys the trust and confidence of the Minister in charge of PWD and Programme Implementation. As a part of his job profile, he is responsible for policy formulation, execution of projects relating to infrastructure initiatives in the State. Besides, he oversees the technical and administrative aspects relating to planning, designing and construction etc. Subash's Minister is an important Minister in the state and significant growth in urban infrastructure development and road network has been registered during his tenure. He is very keen for launching an ambitious road construction project in the near future. Subash is in regular touch with the Minister and is working various modalities of road construction project. Regular meetings, interactions and presentations are made by him to the Minister before a formal public announcement of the project is made by the Minister. Subash's only son Vikas is in real estate business. His son, from his own sources, is aware that the mega road project is on the anvil and announcement in this regard is expected anytime. He is very keen to know from his father the exact location of the upcoming project. He knows that there would be quantum jump in the prices of land in the vicinity. Buying land at this stage at cheaper prices would benefit him decidedly. He is pleading with him (his father) day in and day out to share him location of the proposed project. He assured him that he would handle the matter discreetly so it would not attract any adverse notice as he in the normal course, keeps on buying land as a part of his business. He feels pressurised because of constant pleadings by his son. Another significant aspect of the matter pertained to the extra/undue interest in the above project by the Minister PWD. His nephew was also having big infrastructure project company. In fact, the Minister has also introduced his nephew to him and indicated to him to take care of his nephew's business interest in the forthcoming project. The Minister encouraged him to act fast in the matter as early announcement and execution of mega road project would enhance his status in the party and public life. In the above backdrop, Subash is in a fix as to the future course of action. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Subash in the above situation? (c) Which of the above would be most appropriate and why?
