GS Paper 4 (Ethics)Ethics and human values
'Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it.' - Dalai Lama
Based on 33 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- Explicit use of opportunity cost as a framework: what alternatives were foregone defines the value of the success
- Concrete examples of sacrifice such as Gandhi giving up his legal practice or Mandela's 27 years in prison, not just generic 'great leaders'
- Counter-view: inherited wealth or shortcuts show success without sacrifice, which the quote challenges, and sacrifice is not always the right price
- Ethical dimension: success that costs integrity (Satyam, Nirav Modi) or health and family is hollow or harmful, so some sacrifices are wrong
- Balance: the Dalai Lama advocates mindful detachment, not self-destruction or extreme deprivation
- Public service angle: officers who give up promotions or private sector pay for integrity, with a specific case cited
Common mistakes
- Focusing on methods and means rather than on what was actually surrendered, which is the core of the quote
- Using vague or unverified examples and personal anecdotes without a clear link back to the quote
- Padding the answer with unrelated digressions such as numerical measures of success or everyday littering examples
- Writing one long block of text or repeating the same point under different headings, with no clear structure
What the better answers did
- Opening with the opportunity cost idea and linking it directly to the quote's logic
- Using a few well-chosen, accurately cited examples (Seshan, Gandhi, Mandela, Kalam) and explaining what each one gave up
- Including a negative example or counter-view to show the quote cuts both ways
- Closing with a conclusion that links sustainable success and means aligned with values to the Dalai Lama's intent
Introduction
Open by stating that the quote reverses the usual measure of success, and introduce opportunity cost as the lens that makes the quote meaningful.
Conclusion
End by stating that success is worth only what it cost and whether the means matched one's values, tying the answer back to the Dalai Lama's emphasis on detachment and sustainability.
Model answer
The Dalai Lama's remark shifts the yardstick of success from what is gained to what is surrendered. Every achievement carries an opportunity cost: the alternatives foregone define the true value of the path chosen.
Sacrifice as the measure of worth
- T.N. Seshan enforced the Model Code of Conduct despite losing political goodwill, and that cost built the credibility of the Election Commission.
- Mahatma Gandhi gave up a lucrative legal practice and personal comfort to lead the freedom struggle. His success is judged by the scale of that renunciation.
- Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in prison. The freedom won at that price shows how much the cause was valued.
- Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam chose an austere life in service of science and education, placing national goals above personal comfort.
When sacrifice corrupts success
- Gains bought through deception are not sacrifice. The Satyam scam (2009) and the Nirav Modi fraud show that success without integrity is hollow.
- Sacrificing health and family for career, as seen in the workaholic who loses everything, shows that some costs should never be paid.
- The Dalai Lama's message is about detachment from craving, not self-destruction. Mindful choices, not extreme deprivation, are the aim.
Cultural and personal dimensions
- Buddhist thought treats attachment as the root of suffering. Giving up craving for status can be the truer success.
- Views on worthy sacrifice differ across cultures, but the core question of what was surrendered remains constant.
- In public service, an officer who refuses a corrupt favour or accepts an unwelcome transfer pays a visible price. That price is a fair measure of integrity.
Judged by what it cost, success gains meaning only when the means align with values and the outcome is sustainable. The quote asks us to weigh not only what we achieve, but what we were willing to give up for it.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerMore GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
- Is conscience a more reliable guide when compared to laws, rules and regulations in the context of ethical decision-making? Discuss.
- The application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view.
- What really matters for success, character, happiness, and lifelong achievements is a definite set of emotional skills—your EQ—not just purely cognitive abilities that are measured by conventional IQ tests. Do you agree with this view? Give reasons in support of your answer.
- In law, a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics, he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so. — Immanuel Kant
- Probity is essential for an effective system of governance and socio-economic development. Discuss.
- Subash is Secretary, PWD in the State Government. He is a senior officer, known for his competence, integrity and dedication to work. He enjoys the trust and confidence of the Minister in charge of PWD and Programme Implementation. As a part of his job profile, he is responsible for policy formulation, execution of projects relating to infrastructure initiatives in the State. Besides, he oversees the technical and administrative aspects relating to planning, designing and construction etc. Subash's Minister is an important Minister in the state and significant growth in urban infrastructure development and road network has been registered during his tenure. He is very keen for launching an ambitious road construction project in the near future. Subash is in regular touch with the Minister and is working various modalities of road construction project. Regular meetings, interactions and presentations are made by him to the Minister before a formal public announcement of the project is made by the Minister. Subash's only son Vikas is in real estate business. His son, from his own sources, is aware that the mega road project is on the anvil and announcement in this regard is expected anytime. He is very keen to know from his father the exact location of the upcoming project. He knows that there would be quantum jump in the prices of land in the vicinity. Buying land at this stage at cheaper prices would benefit him decidedly. He is pleading with him (his father) day in and day out to share him location of the proposed project. He assured him that he would handle the matter discreetly so it would not attract any adverse notice as he in the normal course, keeps on buying land as a part of his business. He feels pressurised because of constant pleadings by his son. Another significant aspect of the matter pertained to the extra/undue interest in the above project by the Minister PWD. His nephew was also having big infrastructure project company. In fact, the Minister has also introduced his nephew to him and indicated to him to take care of his nephew's business interest in the forthcoming project. The Minister encouraged him to act fast in the matter as early announcement and execution of mega road project would enhance his status in the party and public life. In the above backdrop, Subash is in a fix as to the future course of action. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Subash in the above situation? (c) Which of the above would be most appropriate and why?
