GS Paper 3Indian economy and trade policy
What are the challenges before the Indian economy when the world is moving away from free trade and multilateralism to protectionism and bilateralism? How can these challenges be met?
Based on 28 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- WTO dispute settlement paralysis: the Appellate Body deadlock leaves India's export disputes without a binding appeal route.
- India's push for WTO reform as a multilateral response, not only bilateral deals.
- China+1 supply chain diversification as India's main opportunity, with examples such as electronics manufacturing.
- PLI schemes and Atmanirbhar Bharat as specific responses to import dependence, with outcomes like reduced import dependency.
- Concrete examples of protectionism: US steel and aluminium tariffs (2018), H-1B visa curbs hitting IT services, and EU CBAM.
- Current account deficit and currency volatility as macro risks when export access shrinks.
Common mistakes
- Listing many challenges and solutions without merging overlapping points, such as friend-shoring and China+1, or manufacturing and Atmanirbhar Bharat.
- Using vague or irrelevant examples, such as domestic fiscal or monetary measures, or unrelated international events, instead of trade barriers.
- Presenting unverified or wrong facts, such as claims about Apple exiting India or RCEP being linked to AUKUS.
- Writing solutions as generic statements without a specific policy, scheme or agreement attached to each one.
What the better answers did
- Linking each challenge to a concrete trade event, such as US steel tariffs, Appellate Body deadlock or visa curbs on IT services.
- Treating India's FTA strategy (UAE CEPA, Australia ECTA, pending UK and EU talks) as a clear, specific counter to bilateralism.
- Structuring the answer into a clear challenges section and a way forward, with each remedy tied to one policy.
- Showing both the risk and the opportunity, such as India as a China+1 alternative alongside exposure to reciprocal tariffs.
Introduction
Open by defining the shift from multilateral rules to protectionism and bilateral deals, and signal that India faces both risks and opportunities.
Conclusion
Close by stating that India must pair WTO reform advocacy with competitive FTAs and a stronger manufacturing base to turn protectionism into opportunity.
Model answer
Protectionism and bilateralism raise the cost of trade, weaken rule-based market access and disrupt supply chains. As India's growth depends heavily on exports, capital flows and manufacturing, these shifts pose serious challenges, though they also open opportunities.
Challenges
- Loss of market access: US tariffs on steel and aluminium (2018) hit Indian exporters, and reciprocal tariffs threaten textiles, gems and jewellery, and pharma.
- Erosion of multilateralism: the WTO Appellate Body has been non-functional since December 2019, so India's disputes lack a binding appeal route.
- Supply chain realignment: India gains from China+1 but faces import dependence in electronics, solar components and chemicals, raising costs.
- Services and remittances: IT and software exports (over $150 billion) face visa curbs and data-localisation rules, and visa crackdowns can dent remittances.
- External vulnerability: falling export earnings widen the current account deficit and make the rupee volatile as capital flows turn cautious.
Way forward
- Multilateral hedge: push WTO reform, including restoring the Appellate Body or an interim appeal mechanism, and build plurilateral coalitions.
- Bilateral and regional deals: CEPA with UAE and ECTA with Australia (both 2022) show the way; conclude pending talks with the UK and EU, and diversify to Africa and Latin America.
- Manufacturing push: PLI schemes across 14 sectors and Make in India cut import dependence and attract China+1 investment.
- Domestic demand and resilience: use the large internal market and demographic dividend as a buffer, and help MSMEs meet quality and compliance standards, such as EU pharma GMP and CBAM requirements.
Protectionism is a real threat, but India can convert it into opportunity by pairing WTO reform advocacy with competitive FTAs and a stronger domestic manufacturing base.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerMore GS Paper 3 questions
- Analyse the factors that have contributed to India's inclusive economic growth in the past decade.
- Faster economic growth requires increased share of the manufacturing sector in GDP, particularly of MSMEs. Comment on the present policies of the Government in this regard.
- Waste circularity is emerging as a sustainable solution to India's mounting solid waste crisis. Discuss the key principles of waste circularity and the government's initiative in this regard. How effective have these measures been in fostering a circular economy?
- To what extent has the Production Linked Incentive Scheme for the food processing industry facilitated value addition, employment generation, and global competitiveness in India's food processing industry?
- Raman is a senior IPS officer and has recently been posted as D.G. of a state. Among the various issues and problems/challenges which needed his immediate attention, the issue relating to recruitment of unemployed youth by an unknown terrorist group, was a matter of grave concern. It was noted that unemployment was relatively high in the state. The problem of unemployment amongst graduates and those with higher education was much more grave. Thus they were vulnerable and soft targets. In the review meeting taken by him with senior officers of DIG Range and above, it came to light that a new terrorist group has emerged at the global level. It has launched a massive drive to recruit young unemployed people. Special focus was to pick young people from a particular community. The said organisation seemed to have the clear objective of utilising/using them for carrying out militant activities. It was also gathered that the said (new) group is desperately trying to spread its tentacles in his state. A definite/reliable intelligence tip was received by the State CID and Cyber Cell that a large number of such unemployed youth have already been contacted by the terrorist outfit/group through social media and local communal organisations and other contacts. The need of the hour was to act swiftly and to check these elements/designs before they assume serious proportions. Discrete inquiries made by the police, through the Cyber Cell, revealed that good numbers of unemployed youth are very active on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. On an average, many of them were spending 6-8 hours each day, using electronic devices/internet, etc. It also came to light that such unemployed youth were showing sympathy and endorsing the messages received from certain persons, allegedly the contact persons of that global terrorist group. Their social media accounts revealed their strong affinity to such groups inasmuch as many of them started forwarding anti-national tweets on their WhatsApp and Facebook, etc. It seemed that they succumbed to their ploy and started propagating secessionist ideology. Their posts were hyper-critical of the government's initiatives, policies and subscribing to extreme beliefs and promoting extremism. a) What are the options available to Raman to tackle the above situation? b) What measures would you suggest for strengthening the existing set-up to ensure that such groups do not succeed in penetrating and vitiating the atmosphere in the state? c) In the above scenario, what action plan would you advise for enhancing the intelligence gathering mechanism of the police force?
- While examining the shortcomings of the land reforms in the past, elaborate what land reforms 2.0 should look like.