The West is fostering India as an alternative to reduce dependence on China's supply chain and as a strategic ally to counter China's political and economic dominance. Explain this statement with examples.
Based on 41 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- Specific Western initiatives such as the US CHIPS Act, iCET and IPEF, which show concrete Western action rather than general intent
- The Quad's functions (maritime security, critical technology, vaccines) and the fact that it includes the US, Japan and Australia
- Recent corporate shifts like Apple's iPhone production in India, linked to the China+1 strategy
- Defence cooperation examples: Malabar exercises, GE-HAL jet engine co-production and US drone deals
- Supply chain initiatives aimed at China dependence, such as the Japan-India-Australia Supply Chain Resilience Initiative
- Limits of the shift, such as India's continued reliance on Chinese inputs
Common mistakes
- Describing China's strengths in detail while giving few examples of Western actions to foster India
- Asserting that the West is backing India without naming a specific policy, agreement, forum or company
- Using vague phrases like growing consensus or strategic ally without explaining what the partnership involves
- Treating the Quad as several groupings or misidentifying its members, and mixing up BRI and IMEC routes
- Leaving out data, scale or dates for investments and initiatives, which weakens credibility
What the better answers did
- Linking each example explicitly to either supply chain diversification or counter-China balancing
- Using a clear two-part structure, economic and strategic, with named initiatives under each
- Citing dated and verifiable examples such as iCET, IPEF, the CHIPS Act and the Quad
- Adding a brief note on limits so the answer reads as analysis rather than advocacy
Introduction
Open by linking COVID-19 supply chain disruption and China concentration risk to the West's search for India as a trusted alternative.
Conclusion
Close by noting that India's gains depend on delivering manufacturing capacity, skills and policy stability, which turns strategic interest into durable partnership.
Model answer
COVID-19 exposed the risks of concentrating manufacturing and critical inputs in one country. Western governments and firms are now pursuing China+1 strategies, and India has emerged as the most prominent partner. Its role is both economic, as a supply chain alternative, and strategic, as a counterweight to China's regional influence.
India as a supply chain alternative
- Apple has moved a growing share of iPhone assembly to India, and the Production Linked Incentive scheme for electronics has drawn in other global manufacturers.
- The US CHIPS Act has encouraged semiconductor investment in India, including Micron's assembly and test facility in Gujarat.
- The Japan-India-Australia Supply Chain Resilience Initiative aims to diversify critical supply chains away from China.
India as a strategic ally
- The Quad (US, Japan, Australia, India) cooperates on maritime security, critical technology and vaccines in the Indo-Pacific.
- The US-India initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET) covers semiconductors, AI and defence industrial links.
- Malabar naval exercises and the GE-HAL deal to co-produce F414 jet engines show deepening defence cooperation.
- The US-led Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), launched in 2022, includes India on supply chain resilience.
Limits
- Western engagement is strategic hedging, not a full decoupling from China, and Indian manufacturing still relies heavily on Chinese components.
The Western push reflects a shared interest in resilient supply chains and balance of power. India's gains depend on delivering infrastructure, skills and policy stability, so that the partnership becomes durable rather than transactional.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start UPSC Mains answer evaluation with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerAsked in UPSC Mains 2024 GS Paper 2 (Q9). See all 2024 GS Paper 2 questions
More GS Paper 2 questions
- Lateral entry into civil services is seen as a reformative step, yet it continues to attract criticism and controversy. Discuss.
- While accountability often necessitates documentation, an overemphasis on bureaucratic procedures and excessive paperwork can inadvertently silence the very voices that public policy intends to empower, particularly at the grassroots. Examine the above statement with suitable illustrations.
- The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially. Comment.
- Examine the scope of Fundamental Rights in the light of the latest judgement of the Supreme Court on Right to Menstrual Health and Hygiene.
- Despite recent steps towards inducting women into combat roles, their participation remains low. Examine the key challenges impeding the greater inclusion of women in the Indian armed forces. Also, suggest suitable measures to enhance their participation.
- As NITI Aayog completes 10 years of its establishment, critically examine its role in the planning and development paradigm of governance in India.