Faith is of no avail in the absence of strength. Faith and strength, both are essential to accomplish any great work. - Sardar Patel
Based on 27 evaluated answers to this question on CollectorBabu: here is what aspirants most often missed, the mistakes that cost marks, and a model answer.
What most aspirants missed
- Patel's own record: Bardoli Satyagraha (1928) and the integration of 562 princely states, with Junagadh (plebiscite, 1948) and Hyderabad police action (September 1948) showing diplomacy backed by force.
- Define the terms: faith as conviction in the goal, strength as willpower, organisation and state capacity, not merely moral steadfastness.
- The flip side: strength without moral purpose becomes tyranny or directionless force, so ethical governance needs both.
- A clear example of faith without strength failing, such as the League of Nations' inability to enforce collective security in the 1930s.
- Contemporary application to nation-building, such as ISRO's Chandrayaan-3 (2023) combining scientific conviction with technical capacity.
- A balance point stating that faith without strength is idealism and strength without faith is tyranny.
Common mistakes
- Introducing unrelated ideas (aptitude, a list of virtues) without linking them back to the faith and strength duo in the quote.
- Listing examples with no line explaining how each shows faith or strength; every example needs one sentence of linkage.
- Treating faith as religious or abstract moral philosophy instead of conviction in a mission.
- Staying generic and skipping Patel's own actions, or using weak or incorrect examples and facts.
What the better answers did
- Defining both terms at the start so the rest of the answer has a clear frame.
- A two-part structure: faith alone falls short, strength alone is directionless, then the combination shown through Patel.
- Using a few well-explained cases, such as Bardoli and the princely states, rather than many thin examples.
- Ending with a balanced conclusion that links the principle to nation-building or ethical governance.
Introduction
Define faith as conviction in the goal and strength as the will and capacity to execute it, then state the balance in one sentence.
Conclusion
Close by tying Patel's integration of princely states back to the idea that great work needs both vision and execution, without simply repeating the quote.
Model answer
Sardar Patel's remark makes a precise point: conviction without the capacity to act remains a wish, and capacity without conviction drifts without direction. Here, faith means belief in the goal, and strength means the will, organisation and power to execute it.
Faith alone falls short
- Belief in an ideal does not enforce it. The League of Nations had collective faith in peace but lacked the means to enforce collective security, and it failed to check aggression in the 1930s.
- Moral appeal without institutional backing gives way to vested interests, as seen in many policy commitments that remain on paper.
Strength without faith is directionless
- Force without a moral purpose produces tyranny or endless conflict, whatever its scale.
- Power needs a goal that citizens accept. Without it, even efficient administration loses legitimacy.
Faith and strength together: Patel's own record
- Bardoli Satyagraha (1928): Patel combined peasants' faith in their cause with disciplined organisation and a no-tax campaign that won concessions from the government.
- Integration of princely states: Patel believed in a united India and executed it through diplomacy, the Instrument of Accession, and firm action. Junagadh was settled through a plebiscite in 1948, and the Hyderabad police action of September 1948 showed that diplomacy was backed by the readiness to use force.
- Gandhi's Dandi March (1930) shows the same combination: faith in satyagraha joined with a mass mobilisation that made civil disobedience effective.
Contemporary relevance
- ISRO's Chandrayaan-3 (2023) reflected scientific faith in the mission, converted into technical capacity and disciplined execution.
- Nation-building today, whether in tackling climate change or pandemic response, needs both public conviction and administrative capability.
Patel's life shows that great work needs vision and execution together. Faith gives direction and purpose, while strength turns that direction into lasting outcomes, and ethical governance requires both.
Write this answer and get it evaluated
Handwritten answers, expert-reviewed, back in under 24 hours. Start with the ₹49 Trial.
Evaluate my answerMore GS Paper 4 (Ethics) questions
- Discuss the role of ethics and values in enhancing the following three major components of Comprehensive National Power (CNP) viz. human capital, soft power (culture and policies), and social harmony.
- Mindless addiction to Form, ignoring the Substance of the matter, results in rendering of injustice. Examine the above statement with illustrations.
- For any kind of social re-engineering by successfully implementing welfare schemes, a civil servant must use reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework. Justify this statement with suitable examples.
- You hold a responsible position in a ministry in the government. One day in the morning you received a call from the school of your 11-year-old son that you are required to come and meet the Principal. You proceed to the school and find your son in the Principal's office. The Principal informs you that your son had been found wandering aimlessly in the grounds during the time classes were in progress. The class teacher further informs you that your son has lately become a loner and did not respond to questions in the class, he had also been unable to perform well in the football trials held recently. You bring your son back from the school and in the evening, you along with your wife try to find out the reasons for your son's changed behaviour. After repeated cajoling, your son shares that some children had been making fun of him in the class as well as in the WhatsApp group of the students by calling him stunted, duh and a frog. He tells you the names of a few children who are the main culprits but pleads with you to let the matter rest. After a few days, during a sporting event, where you and your wife have gone to watch your son play, one of your colleague's son shows you a video in which students have caricatured your son. Further, he also points out to the perpetrators who were sitting in the stands. You purposefully walk past them with your son and go home. Next day, you find on social media, a video denigrating you, your son and even your wife, stating that you engaged in physical bullying of children on the sports field. The video became viral on social media. Your friends and colleagues began calling you to find out the details. One of your juniors advised you to make a counter video giving the background and explaining that nothing had happened on the field. You, in turn posted a video which you have captured during the sporting event, identifying the likely perpetrators who were responsible for your son's predicament. You have also narrated what has actually happened in the field and made attempts to bring out the adverse effects of the misuse of social media. (a) Based on the above case study, discuss the ethical issues involved in the use of social media. (b) Discuss the pros and cons of using social media by you to put across the facts to counter the fake propaganda against your family.
- The Doctrine of Democratic Governance makes it necessary that the public perception of the integrity and commitment of civil servants becomes absolutely positive. Discuss.
- Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being.
