Provision for the representation of Anglo-Indian community in the Lok Sabha has been made in the Constitution under the article

Article 331 is the answer. It allowed the President to nominate up to two members of the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha if he felt the community was not adequately represented. It was a limited safeguard for a small minority, not a general electoral quota.

• Article 221 deals with salaries and allowances of High Court judges, not representation.
• Article 121 bars discussion in Parliament on the conduct of Supreme Court and High Court judges, except during a removal motion.
• Article 139 empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs for purposes beyond Article 32, as conferred by Parliament law.

Core concept: special representation for communities under Part XVI (Articles 330 to 342). Article 330 covers SC/ST seats in the Lok Sabha and Article 333 covers Anglo-Indian nomination to state assemblies. Mains angle: whether nominated representation for a minority fits with the principle of democratic equality.

Update: the 104th Constitution Amendment Act, 2019, in force from 25 January 2020, ended Anglo-Indian nomination to the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. Article 331 is therefore now omitted, but it was the correct answer for the 2013 exam.

Trap: candidates confuse Article 331 with Article 333 (the state assembly counterpart) or with Article 330 (SC/ST reservation in the Lok Sabha).