The provision for the representation of Anglo-Indian community in the Lok Sabha has been made in the Constitution under:

The correct answer is A, Article 331. It allowed the President to nominate up to two members of the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha if he felt the community was not adequately represented. This was a nominated seat, not an elected one.

Why the others are wrong:

• Article 221 deals with salaries and allowances of High Court judges, not representation.
• Article 121 bars discussion in Parliament on the conduct of a Supreme Court or High Court judge in the discharge of duties.
• Article 139 empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs for purposes other than those in Article 32.

Core concept: special representation for minorities through nomination. This ties to Mains GS-2 on the Constituent Assembly's compromise on minority reservations and whether such provisions should continue. Note that the 104th Constitutional Amendment (2019) omitted this provision, and the Anglo-Indian nomination ended in January 2020. So the answer is right for 2015, but the law has since changed.

Trap: Candidates recall Article 331 correctly but then assume it still operates today, so they answer a current-affairs question with outdated law.